Raheem Sterling and his agent - offer them what they want or cut our losses?

The infamous interview

Raheem Sterling has received a large amount of media attention surrounding contract issues and the will he, won’t he sign debacle has perpetuated, particularly in the last few days having given an interview around the subject for the BBC. I wrote back in March about the importance of keeping Sterling and my opinion hasn't changed – although a different perspective is required.

In the interview he was quoted saying ‘I’m not a money grabbing 20 year old’ which on the face of it is hard to believe if reports are true that he’s turned down a £100,000 contract offer. But if it’s not money, what is it preventing him signing a new deal?

Reports from inside the club have repeatedly stated that he wants to wait until the end of the season before making a decision about his future, so why is there a constant media buzz surrounding the issue? Apart from the interview, it’s his agent.

I’m not afraid to say that agents are completely ruining football. Extortionate fees, inflated prices, constant unsettling of players are just some of the consequences of agents. The term ‘money grabbing’ is much more suited to this group of leechers. They don’t care about football or player’s wellbeing, as long as they get a fat pay check at the end of the day, they’re happy. And it’s sad to see that they have such an influence over football.

Sterling’s agent is deliberately stirring things up in the media in the hope of his client receiving more money from a new contract, resulting in more money for himself. If this fails, other clubs will be monitoring the situation ready to take advantage of Liverpool’s dithering by paying a huge fee, from which his agent will profit from too. It wasn't Sterling’s idea to do the interview; it was a poorly advised decision from his agent hoping to squeeze every single drop of publicity out of the saga, which in turn will increase Sterling’s price.

I still maintain that we should try and do everything we can to keep Sterling, one of the biggest talents in world football, but if we could get £60m for him, that would be a tempting proposition for the club. Considering he will have 2 years left on his contact this summer, his value will probably start to fall if we keep him, even at his rate of development with pressures of losing him for free.

Having said this, Rodgers knows best and we have to trust him that he will make the best decision for the club. I think either way the fans will back the outcome.